City politician Hon Alinur Mohamed has expressed his discontent with Uasin Gishu graduate Mercy Tarus. Alinur voiced his displeasure over Mercy’s conduct, stating that she exhibited disrespect, delivered lectures, and raised her voice against Uasin Gishu’s prominent figures, including Senator Jackson Mandago, Governor Jonathan Bii, and Deputy Governor John Barorot.
Taking to Instagram, Hon Alinur expressed his disappointment towards those who praised Mercy Tarus, asserting that her behavior was discourteous and counterproductive in addressing the situation.
The politician further critiqued Mercy Tarus for her lack of discretion in choosing her words, leading to a deviation from the main issue. He highlighted the potential consequences of her behavior, emphasizing that her actions could jeopardize her future prospects.
Alinur underscored the significance of acknowledging the stature of the leaders involved, depicting them as elders and parental figures. He called for Mercy to extend an apology for her conduct and urged against the unnecessary dramatization of the situation to secure refunds.
Mercy Tarus was among the numerous students adversely affected by the infamous Uasin Gishu County government overseas scholarship program. When the affected parents and students convened for a meeting with county officials, Tarus stood out by confronting the leaders head-on.
With boldness, she openly confronted the leaders regarding the failed educational initiative, despite parents having invested substantial sums. The promise of university placements in Finland had prompted parents to borrow loans and even sell properties.
The resolute 24-year-old conveyed her emotions as she demanded reimbursements for payments made towards the botched overseas scholarship program.
Tarus responded to the leaders’ delayed arrival at the meeting venue, three hours past the agreed time. She questioned the prolonged waiting period for parents, students, and other attendees, expressing dissatisfaction with their treatment.
Accusing the leaders of disseminating falsehoods, Tarus pointed out the contrast between their comfortable overseas living and the struggles faced by students and parents. She further inquired about the utilization of the funds, highlighting the stark disparity between her current circumstances—selling porridge and mandazi—and her erstwhile aspirations of studying abroad.
Undeterred, the Kabarak University graduate remained steadfast in her commitment to speaking her truth. Her primary aim was to hold leaders accountable to the constituents who had entrusted them with positions of authority.
