I want to sue my wife for denying me "TWATWA" -
trending

I want to sue my wife for denying me “TWATWA”

Can I legally pursue my spouse for refusing to engage in conjugal relations with me? This is a question that has been on my mind for some time. After all, these are rights that we both possess, and it’s not a matter of her being ill or unable; she simply claims to not be in the mood. As a devout Christian man, I’ve made a vow to remain faithful to my wife, and even within our Christian faith, it’s clear that we should not deny each other the intimacy of conjugal relations. It’s been a challenging three months, and I’m unsure of how to proceed.

Laws regarding the right to sue or be sued apply universally, and the Bill of Rights in Chapter Four of the Constitution is comprehensive and sometimes specific. However, it’s crucial to understand that the context in which these rights are exercised matters. In the case of conjugal rights, one can only seek legal recourse if the denial occurs within a legally recognized marriage.

The foundation for a spouse to potentially sue for conjugal rights is established through the framework of marriage, as defined in Section 3 of the Marriage Act, which recognizes marriage as a voluntary union between a man and a woman, whether in a monogamous or polygamous relationship and registered under the act. In such a marriage, certain rights and responsibilities are shared between the husband and wife.

The issue of denial of conjugal rights is anchored in Article 45 Clause 3 of the Constitution, which grants both spouses equal rights during the course of their marriage. It is evident that sex plays a significant role in both maintaining and potentially ending a marriage, as it is listed as one of the factors that a court may consider in suspending or terminating a marriage. Section 20 of the Matrimonial Cause Act provides further clarity by stating that a petition for the restitution of conjugal rights may be brought before the court by either the husband or the wife. The court, upon being satisfied with the truth of the allegations in the petition and the absence of legal grounds to deny the decree for restitution of conjugal rights, may grant such a decree.

It’s important to note that for a marriage to be considered for suspension, separation, and ultimate termination, certain conditions must be met, such as accusations of adultery, cruelty, exceptional depravity, desertion for at least three years by the non-petitioning spouse, or evidence of an irretrievable breakdown of the marriage.

However, the legal system is cautious about coercing couples to remain together when their marriage is clearly untenable. There is a growing jurisprudence discouraging such practices, with the recognition that if a marriage has irretrievably broken, it should be dissolved, and the residual judgment left to the divine order. In such cases, conjugal rights are viewed as a fruit of the marriage union.

It is essential to remember that court action should be a last resort. As a couple, it’s advisable to explore alternative measures, such as mediation and reconciliation, which are recognized in Article 159 (2c) of the Constitution. These methods can potentially lead to the reestablishment of a harmonious relationship and the reopening of the channels for conjugal relations.

Your expressed desire not to seek such services elsewhere indicates a commitment to resolving the issue within your marriage. Seeking professional help to understand the underlying causes of your wife’s behavior may be a beneficial step. If you do eventually involve the court, it’s worth noting that court orders are typically more respected and enforceable by both parties. Alternatively, the court may recommend a court-mediated process and intervene only if these efforts fail to yield the desired results.

In summary, while the denial of conjugal rights can be considered a form of mental cruelty and a source of dissatisfaction in many marriages, legal action should be considered only after all other avenues for resolution have been exhausted. The court should be the last resort in resolving such delicate matters, as preserving the sanctity of the marital institution is of paramount importance.