Political commentator Cosmo Choy has sparked heated debate after coming to the defense of President William Ruto, dismissing claims linking him to the death of veteran politician Cyrus Jirongo. In his remarks, Choy portrayed Ruto as innocent, arguing that accusations being pushed by opposition figures are driven by political malice rather than facts.
According to Choy, the opposition is engaging in what he described as propaganda and character assassination, accusing them of attempting to shift blame and stir public anger against the president. He insisted that Ruto has no history of violence, suggesting that the allegations are part of a broader strategy to tarnish his image and weaken his leadership.
The comments come at a time when political temperatures remain high, with leaders and commentators frequently trading accusations across the political divide. While some opposition voices have questioned the circumstances surrounding Jirongo’s death, government allies and supporters have strongly dismissed any attempts to implicate the president, calling for responsible discourse and respect for due process.
Choy’s defense highlights the deep polarization in Kenyan politics, where sensitive issues are often quickly politicized. Supporters of the president argue that unverified claims risk misleading the public and undermining trust in institutions, while critics maintain that leaders should always be subjected to scrutiny.
As the debate continues, many Kenyans are calling for calm, facts, and reliance on official investigations rather than political rhetoric. The controversy once again underscores how quickly political narratives can shape public opinion, especially when emotions and partisan loyalties come into play.
