Political tensions escalated after Farouk Kibet publicly warned former President Uhuru Kenyatta over what he described as the alleged misuse of public funds to finance unauthorized meetings.
In his statement, Farouk accused Uhuru of using money he claimed was “stolen from Kenyans” to organize gatherings that are outside legal or official frameworks. He warned that such actions would not go unchecked and suggested that authorities would take decisive action if the allegations were confirmed.
The comments reflect ongoing political friction between factions aligned with President William Ruto and those perceived to remain loyal to Uhuru Kenyatta. Since leaving office, Uhuru has continued to engage in political activities, which critics interpret as attempts to maintain influence within certain regions and communities.
Supporters of Uhuru, however, argue that as a former head of state, he has the constitutional right to engage with citizens and participate in public discourse. They caution against interpreting normal political activity as unlawful or malicious.
This exchange highlights the larger issue of accountability versus political rivalry in Kenya. While accusations of corruption or misuse of public funds are serious and warrant investigation, handling them through official channels rather than public threats ensures transparency and adherence to the rule of law.
The incident also underscores how post-presidential political activity continues to be a flashpoint in Kenya, with every action closely scrutinized by both allies and opponents.
