Former Nandi Hills MP Alfred Keter recently made a bold political statement after visiting Kibera, claiming that the people of Nairobi are firmly “Wantam” and overwhelmingly opposed to President William Ruto and what he termed the “Kenya Kwanza enterprise.” According to Keter, the opposition is not limited to traditional critics of the government but even includes members of the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM), a revelation he described as shocking. His remarks have reignited debate about public sentiment in Nairobi and what it signals for Kenya’s political future.
Nairobi has historically been a political bellwether, often reflecting broader national moods. As Kenya’s capital and largest urban center, it brings together diverse communities, economic classes, and political loyalties. Informal settlements such as Kibera are particularly significant because they house large populations of low-income earners who are highly affected by economic policies, cost of living, employment opportunities, and access to public services. When leaders like Keter claim that such communities are united in opposition, it suggests deep frustration at the grassroots level.
Keter’s assertion that even ODM supporters are “Wantam” is especially notable. ODM has long positioned itself as the main opposition party, while at the same time maintaining working relationships with the government on certain national issues. If ODM supporters are indeed expressing anger toward the current administration, it may point to dissatisfaction that cuts across party lines, driven more by economic hardship than by political ideology. Rising prices of basic commodities, housing challenges, unemployment, and taxation pressures have become everyday realities for many Nairobi residents, fueling discontent regardless of party affiliation.
However, political statements made by opposition figures must also be viewed critically. Leaders often amplify public anger to strengthen their political narratives and mobilize support. While frustration with the government is real and visible in many urban areas, it is difficult to conclude that Nairobi is 100 percent united against President Ruto. The city remains politically diverse, with supporters of different parties and viewpoints coexisting, even within the same neighborhoods.
What Keter’s remarks clearly highlight is a growing sense of economic and social pressure among ordinary citizens. Whether labeled “Wantam” or not, many Nairobians are demanding accountability, relief from the high cost of living, and policies that directly improve their daily lives. The intensity of this mood, especially in informal settlements, should be a serious signal to those in power.
Alfred Keter’s statement reflects a broader and increasingly vocal frustration within Nairobi’s population. While his claim may be politically charged, it underscores the reality that public patience is being tested. For the government, the message from the capital is clear: ignoring the voices from the ground, especially in marginalized communities, carries serious political risks.
