President William Ruto has launched a sharp critique of Wiper Party leader Kalonzo Musyoka, highlighting what he describes as a lack of tangible contributions during Kalonzo’s four decades in politics. Speaking publicly, Ruto contrasted his own political track record with that of Kalonzo, asserting that the latter has not delivered key infrastructure or development projects, including roads, schools, or churches.
Ruto argued that Kalonzo’s leadership has been largely symbolic, claiming that he has spent much of his political career touring his home region without initiating significant development. By raising these points, Ruto sought to question Kalonzo’s credibility and suitability for national leadership roles in the upcoming election cycle.
Political analysts note that such statements are part of the increasingly heated rhetoric ahead of the 2027 General Election, as leading figures position themselves and critique opponents to consolidate support. While Ruto emphasized his achievements as evidence of effective leadership, Kalonzo’s supporters argue that political impact cannot be measured solely by infrastructure projects, citing other forms of community and national contributions.
The remarks have further intensified debates about governance, accountability, and the performance of long-serving politicians in Kenya. As the campaign environment heats up, such exchanges are expected to continue, highlighting the stark contrasts politicians draw to influence voter perception and support.
