Political commentator and activist Robert Alai has criticized Kiharu Member of Parliament Ndindi Nyoro following reports that schoolchildren in the constituency were served chapati under a school feeding initiative.
In a statement that sparked debate online, Alai argued that chapati, while popular, is not an ideal food choice for young learners. According to him, frequent consumption of chapati could expose children to lifestyle-related diseases later in life due to its high carbohydrate and oil content.
“Chapati is a source of many lifestyle diseases in kids,” Alai claimed, urging leaders to prioritize healthier meal options in school feeding programs.
Alai’s remarks have ignited mixed reactions among Kenyans. Some agreed with his concerns, noting that balanced diets rich in vegetables, proteins, and whole grains are more suitable for children’s growth and long-term health. Others, however, defended Nyoro’s initiative, arguing that chapati is filling, affordable, and a welcome improvement compared to hunger or inadequate meals.
Supporters of the Kiharu MP pointed out that the chapati program was introduced to boost school attendance, improve concentration in class, and support children from vulnerable households. They further noted that many parents struggle to provide regular meals, making the feeding initiative a relief to families.
Health experts observing the debate have emphasized that the issue should not be about demonizing specific foods but ensuring balance, moderation, and nutritional diversity in school meals.
As discussions continue, the controversy highlights the broader national conversation on school feeding programs, child nutrition, and the responsibility of leaders to balance welfare initiatives with long-term health considerations.
