A 21-year-old man has gone viral online after publicly declaring that he refuses to work, arguing that he was “born without his consent,” a statement that has ignited a heated debate across social media platforms worldwide.
In a video that has racked up millions of views, the young man stated that, because he never chose to be born, his parents should bear full financial responsibility for his life. He argued that being forced to work to survive in a life he did not ask for is fundamentally unfair, and that the burden of provision should rest with those who brought him into existence.
The post has sparked fierce reactions online, with some users describing his perspective as “thought-provoking” and a legitimate critique of societal expectations, while others have called it “entirely unrealistic” and “selfish.” Philosophers, ethicists, and social commentators have joined the conversation, debating whether individuals have a moral claim to parental support based solely on the circumstances of their birth.
The young man’s statement has also reignited discussions about the nature of personal responsibility, generational obligations, and the ethics of work in modern society. Some argue that while the notion of being “born without consent” raises valid philosophical questions, practical life requires individuals to contribute economically and socially regardless of their birth circumstances.
Despite the criticism, the 21-year-old maintains that he will not seek employment and insists that society—and particularly his parents—should shoulder the costs of his survival.
The viral post continues to dominate social media, inspiring memes, debates, and a global conversation about the boundaries between personal freedom, responsibility, and the ethics of existence.
