Uganda’s Chief of Defence Forces, General Muhoozi Kainerugaba, has sparked outrage after issuing a hard‑hitting statement directed at opposition leader Bobi Wine. In the remarks, Muhoozi denied allegations that security forces assaulted Bobi Wine’s wife, Barbie Kyagulanyi, insisting that soldiers do not target women and dismissing claims of her mistreatment.
However, the general’s comments took a more alarming turn when he shifted focus to Bobi Wine himself, describing the opposition figure in derogatory terms and issuing what many have interpreted as a direct threat. Muhoozi stated that security forces were instead interested in Bobi Wine, warning that if he were caught, he would “see fire,” language that has drawn sharp criticism from human rights advocates and political observers.
The statement has intensified concerns about the use of threatening rhetoric by senior military officials, particularly in a politically charged environment. Critics argue that such language undermines democratic norms, intimidates opposition voices, and raises fears about the safety of political actors in Uganda. Supporters of the opposition have condemned the remarks as reckless and dangerous, calling for restraint and respect for civil liberties.
As reactions continue to pour in, the episode has reignited debate about the role of the military in politics and the limits of acceptable public discourse by those in positions of power. The controversy adds to ongoing tensions between the government and opposition figures, with growing calls for accountability, calm, and adherence to the rule of law.
