Outspoken activist John Methu has launched a fierce verbal attack on President William Ruto, accusing him of relying on state power and force rather than popular support to maintain authority. In a strongly worded statement, Methu alleged that the president hides behind state instruments of violence, insisting that intimidation, police action, and force cannot substitute for genuine public legitimacy.
Methu argued that President Ruto did not ascend to power because of coercive institutions, stressing that leadership should be rooted in the will of the people rather than fear. He warned that the use of bullets and teargas against dissenting voices only deepens public anger and alienation, rather than silencing criticism. According to him, repression cannot shield any leader from political accountability.
The activist further framed the struggle against what he described as brutality as a collective responsibility, saying that even threats and intimidation would not derail efforts to challenge the current administration. His remarks reflect a broader frustration among sections of the public who believe the government has responded to criticism and protest with heavy-handed tactics instead of dialogue.
Methu’s statement has intensified debate around governance, civil liberties, and the limits of state power in Kenya. While supporters see his words as a bold stand against perceived oppression, critics argue that such rhetoric risks inflaming political tensions. The episode underscores the growing polarization in national politics as questions of legitimacy, authority, and the right to dissent continue to dominate public discourse.
