The courtroom has once again proven to be a powerful arena for political and civic battles in Kenya, following a dramatic legal victory by activist Nuru Okanga and his lawyer, Embakasi East MP Babu Owino, against President William Ruto’s team. The ruling, which favored Okanga, has sparked widespread discussion about the rule of law, political tolerance, and the role of the judiciary in safeguarding constitutional rights.
Nuru Okanga has often been a controversial figure, known for his outspoken activism and strong political alignment. His arrest and subsequent court case were viewed by many supporters as an attempt to intimidate dissenting voices. On the other hand, the state maintained that its actions were lawful and justified. The court’s decision, however, tilted the scales in favor of Okanga, reinforcing the principle that every Kenyan, regardless of political affiliation, is entitled to due process and fair treatment under the law.
Babu Owino’s role as Okanga’s lawyer added both legal and political weight to the case. Known for his sharp courtroom skills and fiery political persona, Owino framed the case as not just a personal legal battle, but a broader fight for civil liberties. His arguments resonated with the court, exposing weaknesses in the state’s case and ultimately securing a decisive win that embarrassed the government’s legal team.
The outcome has wider implications beyond the individuals involved. It sends a strong message to state institutions that the judiciary remains independent and willing to check executive excesses. At a time when concerns have been raised about shrinking democratic space, the ruling reassures Kenyans that courts can still act as a shield against abuse of power.
Politically, the loss is a setback for President Ruto’s administration, particularly among critics who already accuse the government of intolerance toward opposition voices. Supporters of Okanga have celebrated the ruling as a victory for democracy, while government allies have urged restraint and respect for legal processes.
What stands out most is how the case highlights the enduring importance of the rule of law. Courts remain one of the few spaces where power, politics, and citizen rights collide on equal footing. For activists, politicians, and ordinary Kenyans alike, the Okanga ruling reinforces a simple but critical truth: justice is not granted by power, but determined by the law.
