Lang’ata Member of Parliament (MP) Felix Odiwuor, widely known as Jalang’o, has responded strongly to claims made by his lookalike, Stanley Mulee Mutisya. Mutisya accused Jalang’o of neglecting him despite their striking resemblance and the promises allegedly made during their first meeting.
In a recent interview, Mutisya revealed that Jalang’o had only given him KSh 1,000 during their initial encounter in 2021 and had since ignored his calls for further assistance. This sparked public outrage and debates about the responsibilities public figures may have toward those who resemble them.
Jalang’o did not shy away from addressing the issue. He took to social media to express his disbelief at Mutisya’s expectations. “You know what I’m laughing at? This is unbelievable! Just because we look alike, I’m supposed to be responsible for you?” Jalang’o responded.
The MP emphasized that mere resemblance does not obligate someone to provide support. “I can’t believe this! Just because we look alike, does that make you my responsibility?” he reiterated, underscoring the absurdity of the situation.
Jalang’o also criticized Mutisya for depending on their resemblance rather than working hard to improve his own circumstances. “If you put as much effort into bettering yourself as you do in highlighting our resemblance, you wouldn’t be giving interviews like this! So, when asked what you do for a living, your answer is ‘I look like Jalas?’” he continued.
This exchange has ignited a wider discussion online about the expectations placed on public figures and whether they have any responsibility toward individuals who resemble them. Many netizens have shared their opinions, with some backing Jalang’o’s perspective while others sympathize with Mutisya’s situation.
Despite the backlash, Jalang’o stands by his position, arguing that everyone should forge their own path rather than relying on superficial similarities for support. “Entitlement! You think he should help you just because you look like him? Who told you to look like him?” echoed one commenter, reflecting Jalang’o’s views.
Meanwhile, Mutisya remains vocal about his frustrations, hoping his story will bring attention to the struggles faced by those living in the shadow of their more famous lookalikes. As the debate continues, it remains to be seen whether this public discourse will lead to any significant changes in the expectations placed on public figures.
