Former police spokesperson Charles Owino has criticized Public Service Cabinet Secretary Justin Muturi for his claims that the National Intelligence Service (NIS) abducted his son, calling the statements “careless” and a breach of President William Ruto’s trust.
Appearing on Citizen TV’s JKlive show, Owino lambasted Muturi, a former Attorney General and member of the National Security Council, for publicly airing such sensitive allegations. Owino emphasized that, given Muturi’s seniority and understanding of national security, he should have exercised greater caution in his remarks.
“Such a statement from a minister is reckless… it undermines the President’s trust. While differences among leaders are expected, they must be careful when addressing matters of this nature,” Owino said.
Owino pointed out that, even if Muturi’s claims were true, the Cabinet Secretary should have shown respect for President Ruto’s efforts to secure his son’s release, rather than making the issue public. He urged leaders to be restrained in their statements, warning that careless remarks could deepen divisions within the country.
Additionally, Owino advised that abduction claims should be treated as allegations, urging against the politicization of such sensitive matters. He reminded leaders of their responsibility to respect Cabinet decisions, or face resignation if they disagree.
“We need to be cautious with our words. NIS is tasked with intelligence and counterintelligence work. It reports to the National Security Council and the President, so any action it takes must be handled discreetly,” Owino added.
However, Irungu Houghton, Director of Amnesty International Kenya, who joined Owino on the program, disagreed with the former police spokesperson’s viewpoint. Houghton defended Muturi, stressing that the CS’s position and credibility made his claims significant.
“Muturi is a highly credible and authoritative figure in government. His claims shouldn’t be dismissed. The Director General of NIS or the President himself should provide clarity on the matter,” Houghton said.
This exchange highlights the ongoing debate over the handling of sensitive national security issues and the tension between transparency and confidentiality in public service.
